Technically correct. But the alternative that he knew would happen was he'd be cut and make no money, so indirectly it would not have been a paycut because it would have been a job making more than $0.

quote:
Its not news and he'd have been stupid to do it.

He'd be stupid to take a job making money instead of getting cut and making no money if his goal was to play and make money?

quote:
Coming out with this right now is actually adding fuel to Kaepernick collusion case fire.

How? It's saying he could have had a job in 2017 but chose not to.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by mdomingue

Lafayette, LA

Member since Nov 2010

31219 posts

Posted on 8/16/18 at 5:44 pm to shel311

quote:
quote:
This was before the anthem protest

It was after.

You’re wrong, the offer was in the spring of 2016. The protests started in August 2016.

quote:
But the alternative that he knew would happen was he'd be cut and make no money, so indirectly it would not have been a paycut because it would have been a job making more than $0.

Wrong again, the offer was made the day his contract became guaranteed for that season.

quote:
quote:
Its not news and he'd have been stupid to do it.

He'd be stupid to take a job making money instead of getting cut and making no money if his goal was to play and make money?

quote:
Coming out with this right now is actually adding fuel to Kaepernick collusion case fire.

How? It's saying he could have had a job in 2017 but chose not to.

Wrong and wrong again.

I think Kap is a douche but if your going argue about stuff, get your facts straight.

Here is the article from the Denver Post in April 2016. https://www.denverpost.com/2016/04/02/broncos-make-push-to-acquire-colin-kaepernick-but-contract-an-issue/

0 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board