Started By
Message

re: So the DNC Server is Clearly Not Important to the Investigation

Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:11 am to
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:11 am to
Let's say the DNC actually allowed the FBI to come in and examine/copy/whatever the servers. Full-fledged access. No rebuff. No crowdstrike involvement.

Then the argument would just be that the DNC conspired with the FBI to mask potentially incriminating info. It would be the same "deep state" argument, would it not?

If you don't trust the intel agencies and the DNC, then what do the servers and crowdstrike even matter? Crowdstrike just gets integrated into the same essential conspiracy theory
This post was edited on 7/17/18 at 9:13 am
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
9853 posts
Posted on 7/17/18 at 9:15 am to
quote:

If you don't trust the intel agencies and the DNC, then what do the servers and crowdstrike even matter?


We've gotten to a place of hyper-partisanship. No evidence that confirms either side wrong is going to be accepted.

The only thing we can do is rely on evidence presented. If either side claims that the evidence was fake or planted, they MUST prove it with facts not circumstantial evidence and allegations.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram