re: How many people here are personally pro-choice but oppose RvW based on state’s rights?

Actually not.

Male.

Old carryover from a juvenile time where using the name of your favorite video game boss seemed a good idea.

Stones and glass houses, considering you are comparing a 12 year old account with a week old one called a derivative of “Dez nuts”

quote:

---

Adds up. I'm sorry ma'am but women are to emotional to make such important decisions. Can you name me one that has? SWB? Crooked Hillary? I'm here to listen.

---

Sure I can. But I also don’t paint my world views based off what I see on TV with tinged glasses. I see it in personal examples. And he’ll, don’t pretend there are ZERO public figure examples.

But there is no point in discussing that angle with you. If a female does the same exact thing that Mitch did , you see it as evidence of your point as opposed to that individual being an a-hole. No matter what is given, you’ll twist it.

So let’s take a step back.

By the objective, unemotional viewpoint, pre third trimester abortions affect primarily one individual. The one making the call. So right or wrong, they are deciding for themselves.


If you are arguing that those best fit should be making the calls of what is best for us why don’t you sign up for the communist/fascist organization of choice because their views are functionally closer to yours than the ones the US was founded upon.