Started By
Message

re: Rebut this simple reality re: Men vs Women physically

Posted on 6/21/18 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27374 posts
Posted on 6/21/18 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

Uh, I know everything about both. I've coached both. Wanta try again?


Then you suck at coaching if you dont think reaction time is different in 60 feet versus 90 feet, so try harder...
This post was edited on 6/21/18 at 2:12 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112766 posts
Posted on 6/21/18 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Then you suck at coaching if you dont think reaction time is different in 60 feet versus 90 feet, so try harder...


Then you suck at physics because a softball crossing the plate is a hell of a lot slower than a baseball at 90 mph.
The density of the baseball creates a much bigger boo boo than a softball.
Wanta try again?
Posted by RichardS
I come from a land down under
Member since Oct 2014
638 posts
Posted on 6/21/18 at 2:22 pm to
LINK

quote:

Then you suck at coaching if you dont think reaction time is different in 60 feet versus 90 feet, so try harder...


...and you're a moron if you don't consider 95 mph vs 60 mph.

quote:

The average D1 pitcher throws 58-62 and tops out at 65mph. So for the sake of argument we’ll use 64mph as a baseline for reaction time. This will give us a reaction time of: .405 seconds. Now lets look at MLB. The average fastball last year was 92.0 MPH and there are many pitchers who hit 100mph including Aroldis Chapman who has hit 105. If we use the average fastball speed of 92mph, the actual reaction time is: 0.400 seconds. Shorter than softball. All that to say, at almost all levels of baseball and softball the reaction times are very similar and don’t justify having a different swing.


LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram