Started By
Message

re: Should Phil be DQ'ed?

Posted on 6/16/18 at 7:02 pm to
Posted by medtiger
Member since Sep 2003
21682 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 7:02 pm to
This is the basis for the people who are arguing for his disqualification...

quote:

1-2. Exerting Influence on Movement of Ball or Altering Physical Conditions A player must not (i) take an action with the intent to influence the movement of a ball in play or (ii) alter physical conditions with the intent of affecting the playing of a hole. Exceptions: 1. An action expressly permitted or expressly prohibited by another Rule is subject to that other Rule, not Rule 1-2. 2. An action taken for the sole purpose of caring for the course is not a breach of Rule 1-2. *Penalty for Breach of Rule 1-2: Match play - Loss of hole; Stroke play - Two strokes. *In the case of a serious breach of Rule 1-2, the Committee may impose a penalty of disqualification


The USGA used a different rule that specifically addresses making a stroke on a moving ball, rule 14-5.
Posted by LCA131
Home of the Fake Sig lines
Member since Feb 2008
72616 posts
Posted on 6/16/18 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

The USGA used a different rule that specifically addresses making a stroke on a moving ball, rule 14-5.



BECAUSE, Rule 1-2 later states, (paraphrased) 'if another rules covers what happened, use THAT RULE. And that's what they decided.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram