Started By
Message

re: Newly released 9/11 footage of Pentagon: Airliner or missile?

Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:38 pm to
Posted by NikolaiJakov
Moscow
Member since Mar 2014
2803 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

I believe Bush and Cheney wanted the war with Iraq and Afghanistan


Fortunately what you believe doesn't really matter.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79393 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:42 pm to
quote:

Dude I think a plane hit the Pentagon so I am not holding on to any theory, I am only asking why they haven't released better video.


Why is it that we are to believe wreckage several meters away from the crash site with AA markings on it, yet the only photos which CrowPie posted show them extinguishing the flames with no plane in the building?

Look at every plane that has been shot down or crashed - 99% of them are still at least somewhat intact. Fwiw I’m not a conspiracy guy but always found it strange there isn’t a single photo of the wreckage inside the outer Pentagon walls.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:44 pm to
Dale51--I base it on their PNAC document where they discuss their vision for reshaping our presence in the middle east and fighting multiple, simultaneous wars. The group sent a letter to President Clinton asking for the removal of Saddam Hussein. Also, the day before 9/11 the Bush team agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan if they didn't turn over Bin Laden.

LINK
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Fwiw I’m not a conspiracy guy but always found it strange there isn’t a single photo of the wreckage inside the outer Pentagon walls.

There were some posted back up the thread.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

I believe Bush and Cheney wanted the war with Iraq and Afghanistan Fortunately what you believe doesn't really matter.


I believe it based on the facts of the PNAC document they helped write. I believe them based on their own words.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:45 pm to
quote:

Dale51--I base it on their PNAC document where they discuss their vision for reshaping our presence in the middle east and fighting multiple, simultaneous wars. The group sent a letter to President Clinton asking for the removal of Saddam Hussein. Also, the day before 9/11 the Bush team agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan if they didn't turn over Bin Laden.

None of that is actual evidence of anything.
Posted by Ebbandflow
Member since Aug 2010
13457 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

Having said that, what do aviation experts have to say about the possibility of a plane being able to fly so low to the ground?


That even an expert pilot would get it 1 out of 10 times.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

quote: Bandar and the Saudis coughed up the money for Iran-Contra and I believe they coughed up the money for 9/11, not because they wanted to attack us, but because his poppy Bush wanted to. What are you basing that claim on?


LINK
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

quote: Dale51--I base it on their PNAC document where they discuss their vision for reshaping our presence in the middle east and fighting multiple, simultaneous wars. The group sent a letter to President Clinton asking for the removal of Saddam Hussein. Also, the day before 9/11 the Bush team agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban in Afghanistan if they didn't turn over Bin Laden. None of that is actual evidence of anything.


It's more believable than a bunch of untrained losers were directed by a man in a cave to outsmart the entire US national security, IMO.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:52 pm to
quote:

...bottom line that guy had to fly a plane at 500 MPH 25 feet off of the ground to hit the pentagon at that angle, nearly impossible


I have been in a plane flying at 25 feet at over 500 Mph, it is not anything special. The are endless videos of planes making high speed low level passes on YouTube, some a lot lower that 25 feet.


quote:

also the mess left behind was not that of a typical plane crash.


Other than the parts painted in American Airlines colors, the engine fan blades, landing gear pieces, and other aircraft parts, what was there that didn't look like typical plane crash?

Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

That even an expert pilot would get it 1 out of 10 times.


Nonsense.
Posted by TigerBait1971
PTC GA
Member since Oct 2014
14865 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

That even an expert pilot would get it 1 out of 10 times.


Do just make shite up?
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:56 pm to
The government told us all however, that these guys could barely fly a small plane, let alone a 757.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35530 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:57 pm to
quote:


It's more believable than a bunch of untrained losers

Untrained in what?
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:59 pm to
we were told that they were terrible students at flight schools and could barely fly. How did they learn how fly a 757?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 5:59 pm to
Thats nice.
None of that New York Times article substantiates any of what you claim. "Some sources claim...people close to the operation...it is suggested that..bank records show", etc, etc.
How does your article prove that Bush, Cheney, etc, concocted and carried out, or let it the 911 attacks happen?
This post was edited on 4/27/18 at 6:07 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

It's more believable than a bunch of untrained losers were directed by a man in a cave to outsmart the entire US national security, IMO.


Thats a strawman. The claim that they were "untrained losers"..directed by "a man in a cave" is simply nonsense.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

quote: It's more believable than a bunch of untrained losers were directed by a man in a cave to outsmart the entire US national security, IMO. Thats a strawman. The claim that they were "untrained losers"..directed by "a man in a cave" is simply nonsense.


Says you.
I've read many, many books which all have had many different theories and also have read the 9/11 commission report (which the co-chairs have said outright is largely fiction) and I have decided what makes the most sense to me. I reject the far out theories and discussion of building 7 etc. and focus on who was behind the conspiracy, however it occurred. Someday I hope the truth comes out.
Posted by skeeter531
Member since Jun 2014
2411 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 6:04 pm to
It is also noteworthy that Bin Laden was never on the FBI most wanted list for 9/11. He was never charged with 9/11. There was NO proof.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 4/27/18 at 6:07 pm to
So did they go in low to avoid radar?

seems they would have wanted to go straight down into the middle where the important people are
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 15Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram