Started By
Message

re: Lowe's take on Boogie and his Free Agency

Posted on 4/24/18 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166497 posts
Posted on 4/24/18 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

So the benefit boogie provides to Niko would only last for about half a year.


it would be a year, we wouldn't trade him making a run. idk all the nba dumb cap shite but there's a will there could be a way.
Posted by Hazelnut
Member since May 2011
16437 posts
Posted on 4/24/18 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

it would be a year, we wouldn't trade him making a run. idk all the nba dumb cap shite but there's a will there could be a way.

I wasn't implying we trade Niko. I was implying Boogie will take half a year to really return to the lineup as a starter with full minutes and even then he probably won't be back to full strength (whatever that may look like with post injury boogie) until the following year where he'd have a full offseason to condition and all that. By then, Niko is gone.

If we resign boogie, people should be prepared to not have the boogie of old back at any point next year. Or maybe ever.
This post was edited on 4/24/18 at 2:48 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram