- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why not McMillan?
Posted on 4/24/18 at 8:03 am to Bert Macklin FBI
Posted on 4/24/18 at 8:03 am to Bert Macklin FBI
quote:
Silver moon, you are either 12 or dim witted. You have changed your argument as to why Mcmillan won’t start multiple times in this thread.
First it was cuz O will only play “his guys”. This is a ridiculous premise that doesn’t deserve anymore answers.
Then it was because he wasn’t even good enough to beat out Etling. Which begs the question, which one of our 3 QBs did beat out Etling? None of them? I guess we shouldn’t start a QB since no QB has ever improved before and they are all worse than Etling.
Your third argument is that it’s clear that the two young guys are more talented. To that I give you Brandon Harris, one of the most physically talented QBs that LSU has ever had. Didn’t really help turn him into a good QB though.
And the fourth argument that Brennan beat JM our last year is equally flawed. Do you think it’s possible that they gave Brennan those reps in hopes that he would become the QB of the future only to find out that he’s still a work in progress? Or is it possible that JM picked up the new offense quicker than MB? Or that JM is a better fit in the new offense?
You seem to live in a world of absolutes where nothing ever changes. To you it seems all that ever was, is.
Here’s a dose of reality, all that is around you is in constant change. What is today, might not be tomorrow. Contrary to your belief, JM could definitely start come September and might be our best option.
There’s a lot of time until we play Miami and any of the 3 QBs might win the job but as of 4/23/18, JM is the best QB we have.
Nah, JM won't start and he isn't the best QB we have right now. It will be Brennan and then Narcisse unless injury or the two of them implode like Jarrett Lee as a RSF. People watch the spring game and draw too many conclusions. It's like the annual Richard Murphy spring game where he runs for +100yds and come the fall he's no better than 3rd on the depth chart.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 8:36 am to Silvermoon_WhereRU
quote:
Nah, JM won't start and he isn't the best QB we have right now. It will be Brennan and then Narcisse unless injury or the two of them implode like Jarrett Lee as a RSF. People watch the spring game and draw too many conclusions. It's like the annual Richard Murphy spring game where he runs for +100yds and come the fall he's no better than 3rd on the depth chart.
He might not start. But ive been saying he probably best available way before the spring game.
Posted on 4/24/18 at 11:36 am to Silvermoon_WhereRU
quote:
Nah, JM won't start and he isn't the best QB we have right now.
Based on what? High School rankings?
I'm not trying to say that JM is a lock to start in September but to just write him off after he outplayed the other 2 QBs in the only game like situation we have seen is dumb.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)