Started By
Message

re: Engagement Ring Question

Posted on 4/19/18 at 8:36 am to
Posted by Duckhammer_77
TD Platinum member
Member since Nov 2016
2712 posts
Posted on 4/19/18 at 8:36 am to
bigger the stone, the cheaper it looks if you go with poor quality. my "diamond guy" in Metairie told me that a little above or below 1.0c is less expensive than a spot-on carat due to popular demand; round cut is most expensive for same reason. My wife's is 1.25c VVS2 G-color "good" cushion cut (or Tiffany cut)..think I paid $9k wholesale for the stone. By going slightly above 1c and going with a less popular cut--but not compromising on color and clarity--I saved some money and still got an heirloom quality stone. They also put low quality smaller stones around it so it looks like she has golf ball of ice on her hand.
Posted by Big Block Stingray
Top down on open road
Member since Feb 2009
1979 posts
Posted on 4/19/18 at 8:45 am to
I
quote:

my "diamond guy" in Metairie told me that a little above or below 1.0c is less expensive than a spot-on carat due to popular demand


Very true, you want just under the next 1.0 or.5 carat.

quote:

round cut is most expensive for same reason.


Asscher is very often among the expensive cuts because of the facets and depth it provides.
This post was edited on 4/19/18 at 8:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram