- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pilot of Southwest flight with blown engine was one of Navy's first female fighter pilots
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:32 am to Fe_Mike
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:32 am to Fe_Mike
quote:FFS, I've answered it twice now.
I know that, because I'm asking a simple question and nobody here is answering it.
quote:I've explained why.
You're all just saying I'm stupid.
quote:I'm sorry you don't like the answer that it's more difficult and "hard" to land a plane with a hole in it and only 1 engine.
They dodge the question, and insult the inquirer.
quote:Your links referenced "flying" one and even has this quote:
I have given multiple legitimate arguments for why I believe landing a twin-engine aircraft that has lost one engine is not that difficult (when compared to landing one with both engines).
quote:This didn't happen, did it. The blade tore up the wing and sent shrapnel into the fuselage.
For example, if one of the fan blades at the front of the aircraft detaches, the engine casing should stop it leaving the engine.
quote:
You all have given no legitimate arguments to prove me wrong,
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:47 am to ell_13
quote:
FFS, I've answered it twice now.
You haven't answered it twice. You've talked about the added pressure of the situation and it being non-routine, but you haven't said from a purely technical perspective why it is more difficult.
Again, in my scenario, the whole thing is a simulation and no lives are at stake. Do any of the physical things that happened make it much more difficult to land the plane?
Since you like sports analogies, let's compare this to kicking in football. Pilots study and practice flying with engine failure. Now, you've got an NFL kicker making 40 yard field goals in practice. Nobody is impressed, he should be able to do that. Make that 40 yarder with the game on the line in the super bowl, and everyone loses their mind he's the best kicker ever. Yes, pressure in a situation makes everything seem more difficult and some people can't cope with it. But when you take away all of the external factors that should -technically- impact the task...was it really all that more difficult? It just seems more difficult.
I'm being very sociopathic about all of this. It sucks that the woman died and it's awesome that the pilot was clutch in landing the plane while sucking oxygen through a mask (do pilots get better masks than passengers? I bet they do...)
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)