- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Oprah's ultra-PC ‘Wrinkle in Time’ stung with bad reviews as ‘cringeworthy’
Posted on 3/8/18 at 11:20 am to Fewer Kilometers
Posted on 3/8/18 at 11:20 am to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
What makes it Ultra-PC?
I'm curious about this too. I saw something interesting about the reviews on this movie on twitter yesterday though. Someone posted a few of the "fresh" reviews of the movie. If you read them, they weren't actually positive.
ETA: I just glanced at some of the fresh reviews and they gave ratings like 2.5/5 or 2.5/4 and 3/5. I guess ratings are subjective, but where do they draw the line at fresh/rotten?
This post was edited on 3/8/18 at 11:24 am
1
Posted on 3/8/18 at 11:58 am to JasonMason
quote:
I just glanced at some of the fresh reviews and they gave ratings like 2.5/5 or 2.5/4 and 3/5. I guess ratings are subjective, but where do they draw the line at fresh/rotten?
Rotten tomatoes, as far as individual reviews, rates anything that scores a 50% (or just "not terrible" for ratings that don't give an alphanumeric rating) or higher as "fresh." So as long as it's a 50% rating, it's a positive.
Then, their total rating is changed to give anything with an average "fresh" rating of like 70% or higher as "fresh." But keep in mind, they're basing the average off of the individual "fresh" ratings.
So basically, a film can get nothing but 50% or higher reviews, but get a 100% Rotten Tomatoes score.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News