Started By
Message

re: Nunes releases 5 page point by point rebuttal

Posted on 2/24/18 at 7:00 pm to
Posted by Kriegschwein
Alemania
Member since Feb 2015
855 posts
Posted on 2/24/18 at 7:00 pm to
She had SCI information that had the headers removed but still had the paragraph markers.

Someone had to cross domain that stuff manually.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 2/24/18 at 7:24 pm to
quote:

She had SCI information that had the headers removed

Link?

Comey never said that anybody removed headers.
Posted by Rex
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
66001 posts
Posted on 2/24/18 at 7:27 pm to
Rep. Cartwright: Those three documents with the little “c”s on them, were they properly documented? Were they properly marked according to the manual?

Director Comey: No.

Rep. Cartwright: According to the manual, and I ask unanimous consent to enter this into the record, Mr. Chairman. According to the manual, if you’re going to classify something, there has to be a header on the document, right?

Director Comey: Correct.

Rep. Cartwright: Was there a header on the three documents that we’ve discussed today that had the little “c” in the text someplace?

Director Comey: No, there were three e-mails. The “c” was in the body in the text, but there was no header on the email or in the text.

Rep. Cartwright: So if Secretary Clinton really were an expert at what's classified and what’s not classified and we're following the manual, the absence of a header would tell her immediately that those three documents were not classified. Am I correct in that?

Director Comey: That would be a reasonable inference.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram