- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Concerning guns and the mentally ill: a look into the recent political past
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:15 am to Pechon
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:15 am to Pechon
quote:
Here we have a law-abiding citizen who had once taken an oath to protect and defend the constitution, you would have their constitutional rights denied.
You obviously can't read. Obama's regulation would not have automatically denied him gun ownership.
How many of you dullards are going to raise the same stupid point?
3
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:16 am to Rex
quote:Says the tool yammering shitgibbon.
How many of you dullards are going to raise the same stupid point?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 11:18 am to Rex
quote:
You obviously can't read. Obama's regulation would not have automatically denied him gun ownership.
How many of you dullards are going to raise the same stupid point?
So what did the regulations say and how would it have prevented this?
Posted on 2/22/18 at 12:24 pm to Rex
Funny how the only official text I can find is this fact sheet from the Obama white house and does not specifically mention veterans. LINK
Yet the VA has taken into account for itself to do so under Obama's administration prior to the EO. The EO did nothing to protect veterans. So looks like you can't read either.
The point I was trying to make is that there was an effort to deny someone their 2nd amendment right through a government agency. Someone can determine you mentally incompetent for any number of reasons, say wearing a fur suit, and without due process deny someone their rights. The EO does the same thing.
Yet the VA has taken into account for itself to do so under Obama's administration prior to the EO. The EO did nothing to protect veterans. So looks like you can't read either.
The point I was trying to make is that there was an effort to deny someone their 2nd amendment right through a government agency. Someone can determine you mentally incompetent for any number of reasons, say wearing a fur suit, and without due process deny someone their rights. The EO does the same thing.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News