Started By
Message

re: Wray confirms:White House Was Warned of Aide’s Background Months Earlier Than Acknowledged

Posted on 2/13/18 at 1:39 pm to
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53498 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 1:39 pm to
Bill went to the WH and saw Obama. He tells his point of view when asked what he saw. Obama's hair was neatly done, and he had on a blue tie.

Sue was with him. Her story: Obama had a weird part in his hair, and he wore a black suit.

Those are NOT contradictions. It paints a complete picture. Hair was neat, but with a part that was weird to 1 observer. He had a suit on and a blue tie with the suite.

Neither stated he had shoes on. Does that mean he was barefooted? No. could he have been? Sure.

The "Trump lied about staff who beat his wife because the time line doesn't match is the same.

Sanders stated they found out the totality in Feb. It is perfectly in line with what the FBI stated.

There is NO contradictions. In fact, the stories verify each other.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
39569 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 1:44 pm to
The accepted leftist response seems to be knee jerk reactions to unverified accusations.

That would be an odd approach coming from an administration lead by a guy that was inundated with unverified accusations.

Does anyone really believe that the media would be praising Trump had he done exactly that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram