- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who was a more questionable hire Mike Archer, Curley Hallman, Gerry DiNardo or Ed Orgeron?
Posted on 2/10/18 at 11:38 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Posted on 2/10/18 at 11:38 am to LSUFanMizeWay
Archer was a whiz kid as a DC and proven himself in that capacity. He was young which was the risk.
Hallman had proven himself successful at Southern Miss even if it was mostly due to Favre.
DiNardo proved himself as a coordinator and then while his record at Vandy wasn’t great, it was a legit success in terms of where they were before he got there.
O is the only one that was a proven massive failure as a head coach and never been in charge of either side of the ball.
Easily he is the worst hire.
Hallman had proven himself successful at Southern Miss even if it was mostly due to Favre.
DiNardo proved himself as a coordinator and then while his record at Vandy wasn’t great, it was a legit success in terms of where they were before he got there.
O is the only one that was a proven massive failure as a head coach and never been in charge of either side of the ball.
Easily he is the worst hire.
This post was edited on 2/10/18 at 11:40 am
1
Posted on 2/10/18 at 7:30 pm to Geauxgurt
quote:
O is the only one that was a proven massive failure as a head coach and never been in charge of either side of the ball.
Not true. He was a defensive coordinator at Ole Miss.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News