Started By
Message

re: Fair take: this does not 100% cast the investigation in a bad light, only key parts

Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:23 pm to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49573 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:23 pm to
Agreed.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
74230 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:24 pm to
Should there have been a special counsel to investigate Trump or not?
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
22048 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:25 pm to
Only the beginning....
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:27 pm to
No special prosecutor without the dossier
Posted by wfallstiger
Wichita Falls, Texas
Member since Jun 2006
12009 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:32 pm to
Do you believe the FBI and/or DOJ operate on an island that never touches the WH? Don't believe we have an inkling as to how deep and dark this rabbit hole will prove to be.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
37504 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:38 pm to
Wouldn't Mueller's investigation naturally be widened to include the Dossier, how it was put together, input Russians provided, FBI involvement and on up the ladder to the DOJ?

It would have to if its really a complete investigation.
Posted by narddogg81
Vancouver
Member since Jan 2012
20428 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Memo makes clear papasoupols was already being investigated before the entire fisa warrant episode. So mueller still has compelling reason to investigate 

a drunk low level unpaid campaign volunteer that neither Trump or anyone on his team probably even knew existed shite talking in a bar, a guy who had previously worked for Hillary Clinton is compelling evidence to investigate?
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 12:46 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram