Started By
Message

re: MEMO: HIC Releases the Memo. Link to memo inside

Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:18 am to
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424370 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I just don't get the part about who paid for it.

that shows extreme prejudice/bias

just think about the more general scenario. your "team" pays a 3rd party to do biased opposition research against your team's political opponent. you then use this biased documentation that you, in effect, created, to sway a judge to grant a warrant

you think the judge shouldn't know how the document originated? imagine what police could do against anyone under this scenario
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 2/2/18 at 11:27 am to
quote:

you think the judge shouldn't know how the document originated? imagine what police could do against anyone under this scenario
I guess I expected the judges to ask those questions and more importantly question the validity of any and all evidence expect supporting and objective evidence.

So to me, if poor and highly questionable information can so easily pass through the process, then that's a major problem regardless of who obtained it.

So that tells me that the validity of the information isn't scrutinized so if poor and highly questionable information can get approval, then that doesn't somehow seem any better just because that poor work was done by law enforcement.

And if law enforcement is presenting it to the court, then whatever bias exists, must also exist in the person presenting it, or they're must too incompetent to be presenting it in the first place.
This post was edited on 2/2/18 at 11:31 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram