Started By
Message

re: LSU ranked last in the SEC, and 122nd in the nation for returning production next year

Posted on 2/1/18 at 3:58 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96699 posts
Posted on 2/1/18 at 3:58 pm to
quote:

The point I was trying to make is that returning starters, for a team that wasn't top 20 material is only a positive if those starters have the potential to improve and improve greatly.
Not exactly.

If they were the starter, that either means the backup was not as good, or your coach cant see talent and started the worse player....
Posted by Erin Go Bragh
Beyond the Pale
Member since Dec 2007
14916 posts
Posted on 2/1/18 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

If they were the starter, that either means the backup was not as good, or your coach cant see talent and started the worse player.

But none of that really matters. Returning starters has long be a staple of college football discussions and I don't think many people take the time to discern the pros and cons of the subject. Its just one of those talking points that almost always gets accepted as being beneficial. Took listening to a debate between a Mississippi State fan and an Ole Miss fan for this to resonate.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram