- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:10 pm to karmew32
The worse call is obviously the interception. I don't see anything conclusive about the kick being good or not.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:17 pm to pvilleguru
There was a clear divot in the ground.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 8:18 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:21 pm to karmew32
quote:
karmew32
Cry more LSU pussy
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:23 pm to karmew32
My memory is fuzzy, but the PP INT didn't bug me that much, because it wasn't like we were moving the ball when we had it - much less scoring.
Allowing the INT just prolongs the inevitable.
Somebody correct me if I'm remembering this wrong.
Allowing the INT just prolongs the inevitable.
Somebody correct me if I'm remembering this wrong.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:24 pm to 14&Counting
quote:Pure class.
Cry more LSU pussy
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:24 pm to Ryan3232
quote:Maybe, maybe not. They also had to determine at what point he had possession.
There was a clear divot in the ground.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 8:38 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:40 pm to karmew32
the PP7 int was bad, but I've seen multiple worse reversals/non-reversals in the NFL this season alone.
Its not really comparable to the missed fg in question, because they made the right call on that one.
Its not really comparable to the missed fg in question, because they made the right call on that one.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:50 pm to karmew32
PP7 was not only an egregious call, but it was upheld on review on spite of clear and convincing evidence. It was Al Riveron level bad.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 8:50 pm
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:50 pm to GarmischTiger
quote:
Pure class.
Quit crying about some dubious call that happened nearly a decade ago.
No one cares.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 8:56 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:Not on those old arse monitors they had in the replay booth.
it was upheld on review on spite of clear and convincing evidence.
Posted on 1/22/18 at 9:21 pm to 14&Counting
quote:I'm not crying.
Quit crying about some dubious call that happened nearly a decade ago.
I'm replying to the OP.
You however are being a bitch.
quote:Apparently you do.
No one cares.
This post was edited on 1/22/18 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:06 pm to pvilleguru
You think they'd have better monitors when HDTV was the standard by then.
Posted on 1/23/18 at 2:18 pm to karmew32
quote:
You think they'd have better monitors when HDTV was the standard by then
Reviewing plays was still fairly new. I think the SEC started using it around 2005. Many places used poor equipment until after 2009 or so. They were probably using the same monitor that was installed in 2004-05. They didn't have much choice but to go with the ruling on the field.
Posted on 1/24/18 at 7:29 am to karmew32
LSU fans intentionally ignore the fact that had Peterson's attempt been ruled an interception they still have to march down the field and score a TD to win the game.
While certainly possible, it was still more unlikely than not, given LSU's QB and the situation.
So even had they gotten the call, they still likely lose anyway.
While certainly possible, it was still more unlikely than not, given LSU's QB and the situation.
So even had they gotten the call, they still likely lose anyway.
Posted on 1/24/18 at 8:48 am to elposter
Field goal was worse since it costed us the GOAT season.
Posted on 1/24/18 at 9:32 am to ShaneTheLegLechler
quote:
ShaneTheLegLechler
0-6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News