- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: House Intel Committee Officially Begins Process To #ReleaseTheMemo
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:29 pm to thebigmuffaletta
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:29 pm to thebigmuffaletta
quote:The two convictions are specifically about lies, to the FBI, about contacts with Russians.
And not a one has anything to do with that goofy muh Russians fairy tale you believe in.
Why are you interested in discussing something you haven't even bothered to scratch the surface on? Like the very, public, newscycle basics?
Honest question. Only thing that interests me almost as much as National Security in psychology.
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:30 pm to Navytiger74
Honest Bob is wasting taxpayer money with procedural foolishness.
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:32 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
The two convictions are specifically about lies, to the FBI, about contacts with Russians.
And yet if those indictments were/are a credible precursor to proving collusion and getting Trump impeached, they would pled guilty to a hell of a lot more than simple perjury and false statements as they would've pled guilty to espionage and conspiracy charges just to name a couple as its the same thing they would be going after Trump for. Only difference would be lesser sentences.
Really don't get where the myth of pleading to lesser charges to catch the big fish comes from.
This post was edited on 1/20/18 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 1/20/18 at 6:01 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
The two convictions are specifically about lies, to the FBI, about contacts with Russians.
False. That's now what the guilty pleas were about. That's the way the media cleverly and deceitfully spins it, but it's not what actually happened. The media makes it sound as if Flynn was lying about contacting Russians. He never lied about that - he openly admits he talked to Kislyak.
The FBI interviewed Michael Flynn under false pretenses. They told him it was a routine meeting about some sort of FBI policy (he was the incoming NSA, remember). They got him in the room with no attorney and grilled him about his call with Kislyak (a total legal call, by their own admission). Flynn didn't recall word for word exactly what he said to Kislyak.
After the interview, the two agents went back to the FBI to brief their superiors. One of the agents told his superiors that Flynn's story checks out and he didn't notice anything really deceitful about it. However, the other agent said "Nope, he lied." Guess who that agent was? Yep, Peter "insurance policy" Strzok. Strzok discovered a few minor inconsistencies in the testimony.
If I asked you to recall verbatim what you talked about with your boyfriend on the phone last week, you couldn't tell me. You might have a general idea, but you couldn't tell me specifics if I carefully crafted by questioning to catch you in a lie. For instance, if I said what time did he call you? And you said "2 o'clock." Later I check the phone records and discover it was really 3 o'clock. Baw, I got you now. You're going down! But that is exactly what happened to Flynn.
The whole thing is a witch hunt. They are prosecuting a career military man (a general) for not recalling the exact language of a perfectly legal phone call. This is what Bob Mueller is wasting our tax dollars doing.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News