Started By
Message

re: BREAKING: House Intel Committee Officially Begins Process To #ReleaseTheMemo

Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:29 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

And not a one has anything to do with that goofy muh Russians fairy tale you believe in.
The two convictions are specifically about lies, to the FBI, about contacts with Russians.

Why are you interested in discussing something you haven't even bothered to scratch the surface on? Like the very, public, newscycle basics?

Honest question. Only thing that interests me almost as much as National Security in psychology.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
114293 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:30 pm to
Honest Bob is wasting taxpayer money with procedural foolishness.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

The two convictions are specifically about lies, to the FBI, about contacts with Russians.



And yet if those indictments were/are a credible precursor to proving collusion and getting Trump impeached, they would pled guilty to a hell of a lot more than simple perjury and false statements as they would've pled guilty to espionage and conspiracy charges just to name a couple as its the same thing they would be going after Trump for. Only difference would be lesser sentences.

Really don't get where the myth of pleading to lesser charges to catch the big fish comes from.
This post was edited on 1/20/18 at 4:33 pm
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17693 posts
Posted on 1/20/18 at 6:01 pm to
quote:

The two convictions are specifically about lies, to the FBI, about contacts with Russians.


False. That's now what the guilty pleas were about. That's the way the media cleverly and deceitfully spins it, but it's not what actually happened. The media makes it sound as if Flynn was lying about contacting Russians. He never lied about that - he openly admits he talked to Kislyak.

The FBI interviewed Michael Flynn under false pretenses. They told him it was a routine meeting about some sort of FBI policy (he was the incoming NSA, remember). They got him in the room with no attorney and grilled him about his call with Kislyak (a total legal call, by their own admission). Flynn didn't recall word for word exactly what he said to Kislyak.

After the interview, the two agents went back to the FBI to brief their superiors. One of the agents told his superiors that Flynn's story checks out and he didn't notice anything really deceitful about it. However, the other agent said "Nope, he lied." Guess who that agent was? Yep, Peter "insurance policy" Strzok. Strzok discovered a few minor inconsistencies in the testimony.

If I asked you to recall verbatim what you talked about with your boyfriend on the phone last week, you couldn't tell me. You might have a general idea, but you couldn't tell me specifics if I carefully crafted by questioning to catch you in a lie. For instance, if I said what time did he call you? And you said "2 o'clock." Later I check the phone records and discover it was really 3 o'clock. Baw, I got you now. You're going down! But that is exactly what happened to Flynn.

The whole thing is a witch hunt. They are prosecuting a career military man (a general) for not recalling the exact language of a perfectly legal phone call. This is what Bob Mueller is wasting our tax dollars doing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram