- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rational v. Emotional thinking: the posi-nega distinction
Posted on 1/13/18 at 4:54 am to doctatigah
Posted on 1/13/18 at 4:54 am to doctatigah
quote:People with low EQ are typically unsuccessful. As much as you see Saban screaming and yelling, his EQ is high. His demand to perfection is even higher. His yelling is an outward effect HE CHOOSES to present to people with lower EQ to CAUSE an emotional response and motivate them ie he isn’t mad at all. He is constantly focusing on the process. The performer’s role is clear and he is able to “see” negative effects that behaviors will have on executing his process 5 steps before they will happen. He predicts and adjusts before the negative consequences better than anyone I’ve seen because of the way he prepares his team.
That’s a distinction without a difference. Talk to any nueroscientist and they’ll tell you: affect (i.e. emotion) and cognition (your “rationality”) are interlinked.
“Emotional thinking” is a perfectly normal form of “rationality” within the psychology literature.
You probably think we “see with our eyes too”.
So much I can say on this subject... a big part of my job in my latter years was to coach other execs...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News