Started By
Message

re: Rational v. Emotional thinking: the posi-nega distinction

Posted on 1/13/18 at 4:54 am to
Posted by Tiger1988
Houston
Member since May 2016
24511 posts
Posted on 1/13/18 at 4:54 am to
quote:

That’s a distinction without a difference. Talk to any nueroscientist and they’ll tell you: affect (i.e. emotion) and cognition (your “rationality”) are interlinked.

“Emotional thinking” is a perfectly normal form of “rationality” within the psychology literature.

People with low EQ are typically unsuccessful. As much as you see Saban screaming and yelling, his EQ is high. His demand to perfection is even higher. His yelling is an outward effect HE CHOOSES to present to people with lower EQ to CAUSE an emotional response and motivate them ie he isn’t mad at all. He is constantly focusing on the process. The performer’s role is clear and he is able to “see” negative effects that behaviors will have on executing his process 5 steps before they will happen. He predicts and adjusts before the negative consequences better than anyone I’ve seen because of the way he prepares his team.

You probably think we “see with our eyes too”.
So much I can say on this subject... a big part of my job in my latter years was to coach other execs...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram