Started By
Message

re: Canada and Orgeron : The story

Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:28 pm to
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34520 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:28 pm to
quote:


Why would Canada drop the possibility of the full contract up front? Didn't every other buyout to former LSU staff have terms that "if" they got new employment that would offset LSU's financial responsibility?


Yes, but that is using the contract-stipulated buyout language. The $1.75M buyout language removes that language to make for a more straight-forward agreement for both parties. His coaching contract is thus null and void moving forward.
This post was edited on 1/10/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted by BayouCowboy
Member since Dec 2012
14564 posts
Posted on 1/10/18 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Yes, but that is using the contract-stipulated buyout language. The $1.75M buyout language removes that language to make for a more straight-forward agreement for both parties. His coaching contract is thus null and void moving forward.

So we agree his buyout is an anomaly. That's all I'm saying. If you want to propose it's a better deal that's fine.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram