- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Great assistants aren't always great head coaches
Posted on 1/4/18 at 1:10 pm to TheHarahanian
Posted on 1/4/18 at 1:10 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:this is true;
Great assistants aren't always great head coaches
and the following is also true:
bad assistants don't move up the ladder, good ones do.
(except of course O
, but he has his own selling points, rah rah recruiter extraordinaire, so they say). You don't know what you have until you have him.
And we happen to have Aranda right now, so there is probably some idea of how good he might be.
1
Posted on 1/4/18 at 1:16 pm to Scoob
quote:correct, but you greatly reduce the risk if you hire a proven commodity, whether it's as head coach or any other job. You don't wait until he's here, with a big contract, to find out he's the wrong guy. Especially for head coach, which is critically important. I don't mind taking a flyer on a position coach once in awhile, but not for head coach or coordinator.
You don't know what you have until you have him.
This concept is common sense - I don't know why it's getting such push back.
This post was edited on 1/4/18 at 1:17 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News