re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?

if the browns were anyone other then the browns, they would trade the #1 and #4 picks to get 2 lower 1st round picks and 2 more 2nd round picks and possibly even a couple of 3rds from a team in desperate need.

with the browns track record of taking busts with all their 1st rnd picks they are better selling them then using them.

hell based on their history i would even resell the lower 1st round picks they get to get even more 2nd and 3rd round picks. if they followed my advice they "could" possibly end up with 4 high 2nd rounders and 4 high 3rd round picks rather then select 2 busts as first rounders as they do every year