Started By
Message

re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?

Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:05 pm to
Posted by GoldenBoy
Winning!
Member since Nov 2004
42017 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:05 pm to
I don't think Kizer is the long term answer.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96899 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 2:13 pm to
Kizer is a stopgap fix IMHO. He isn’t the future but he is good enough as a tackling dummy while they figure out the future at QB.


If they don’t see Rosen, Darnold, or Allen as that future, I don’t see spending a high pick on them when there are so many gaps to plug.

Even if they improve to the point where they win 4 more games next year they are still drafting high in the first and have the assets to trade up for a QB they really want.
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30237 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

I don't think Kizer is the long term answer.




I don't either, but one of two things is occurring:

1) The Cleveland browns literally whiff on every QB draft pick

or

2) The Cleveland browns ruin every QB draft pick

In either case, the Cleveland Browns are pretty much wasting a pick by choosing a QB.

I'd rather have Kizer with a stud offensive line than Rosen, Darnold, or anyone else behind a shite line.
This post was edited on 1/3/18 at 7:03 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram