- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:46 am to StupidBinder
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:46 am to StupidBinder
quote:It's unbelievable.
Exactly. There is no reason a team with this much draft capital should perpetually be this terrible... ...except for the fact that they keep wasting said draft capital on the annual “Aaron Rodgers II is right around the corner” QB lottery.
They refuse to learn their lesson. Even "sure-fire" QB locks like Luck don't always have the careers that will lift your franchise to championship levels.
Hell, Brees, Rodgers, Warner, Favre, Young, Unitas only have 1 SB.
And Manning, Manning, Starr, Roethlisberger, Staubach, and Elway only have 2.
What fricking good does it do to have an all-time great at QB if he is surrounded by crap?
Same goes for Barkley or any other RB.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)