- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:38 am to Rand AlThor
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:38 am to Rand AlThor
Look what Fournette has done for Bortles and the Jags this year. If there is a can't miss RB in top 10 it's a no brainer.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 11:43 am to nicholastiger
quote:
Look what Fournette has done for Bortles and the Jags this year. If there is a can't miss RB in top 10 it's a no brainer.
I agree to an extent. Jacksonville and Dallas both had built up other parts of their team that they felt adding an elite RB would compliment their team massively and it worked out for both of them.
The Jags had a dominant defense and adding LF7 compliments that, just like having Zeke helped compliment their o-line.
I think there is a time to take a RB early in the 1st round, but Cleveland has so many glaring weaknesses that I think they should look elsewhere in this situation.
Posted on 1/3/18 at 12:01 pm to nicholastiger
quote:
Look what Fournette has done for Bortles and the Jags this year. If there is a can't miss RB in top 10 it's a no brainer.
Adding Calais Campbell was a bigger reason than Fournette.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)