- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:32 am to GoldenBoy
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:32 am to GoldenBoy
Cleveland outrushed their opponents by ~150 yards on ~80 fewer carries. They also had >1 average yards per carry than their opponents. That's huge. Barkley is not even a need.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 3/2/18 at 6:27 pm to High C
quote:
Cleveland outrushed their opponents by ~150 yards on ~80 fewer carries. They also had >1 average yards per carry than their opponents. That's huge. Barkley is not even a need.
thats the thing, everyone is talking about shelf life being short, thats not the real issue in my opinion.
the real issue is a better RB might get you .2 yards per carry more than the guy you have, whereas improving other areas could make a much bigger difference
i would like to see a Value Over Replacement stat for NFL RBs compared to linemen
This post was edited on 3/2/18 at 6:28 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)