Started By
Message

re: Why wouldn't Browns take Saquon Barkley first overall?

Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:24 am to
Posted by oleyeller
Vols, Bitch
Member since Oct 2012
32035 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:24 am to
I am huge on barkley. But drafting a rb is crazy. Their shelf life is so short. Rbs are a dime a dozen. You can find value later in the draft. I think the browns should go after cousins and draft all defense. That is how you build a team fast, oline and defense. Heck browns have 2 very good rbs imo.
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
17477 posts
Posted on 1/3/18 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I am huge on barkley. But drafting a rb is crazy. Their shelf life is so short. Rbs are a dime a dozen. You can find value later in the draft. I think the browns should go after cousins and draft all defense. That is how you build a team fast, oline and defense. Heck browns have 2 very good rbs imo.


They have a pretty good defense already, especially up front. They need to shore up the OL, improve the secondary, and get a 2nd WR option to Gordon and move Coleman to #3. Also need to use that cap space to get Cousins or a vet QB and keep Kizer as the backup.

If I have their picks, I use the first on a receiver and the 2nd on the OL. Use my 2nd round to get a corner, another OL, and maybe a TE. This assuming they sign a vet QB. Browns have no luck with rookie QBs, they need a proven commodity and they have the money to do so.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram