- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wife having a child while married that isn't yours
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:21 pm to GoldenSlumbers
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:21 pm to GoldenSlumbers
Finally someone actually quoting the statute.
Thanks
4 pages of mostly morons
Thanks
4 pages of mostly morons
Posted on 12/28/17 at 10:32 pm to soccerfüt
quote:
Finally someone actually quoting the statute.
That statute is just how the court sees it until paternity is challenged or pleadings filed. Kind of a temporary ruling. The "presumption" the statute speaks of is easily overturned once paternity tests flush out the facts. The statute is simply to protect the child, holding the first logical "father" responsible until the smoke clears. If the child is shown to be from another man, that statute is superseded by findings under the next provision in the process of determining support. The man, whether married or having signed birth certificate will ultimately NOT be forced to pay support if the child is not his.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)