Started By
Message

re: NY Times: Pentagon’s UFO Program - aerospace/esoteric/quantum mechanics/future

Posted on 7/26/20 at 5:33 pm to
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11091 posts
Posted on 7/26/20 at 5:33 pm to
FOIA info on crash retrieval program
Project Moondust...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_jy751egLoY

quote:

Rare Documents Disclose Hints of UFO Crash Retrievals

12,406 views 555 6 Share Save Report
It's [redacted]. 14.9K subscribers SUBSCRIBE

Published on Jul 11, 2020

0:00 Battelle, it can be done. 1:05 E.J. Center's flying saucer parts 1:47 Moon Dust and the 1127th 3:26 Canadian UFO crash files 6:17 Significance of "CIRVIS" 7:49 What the documents prove Why are UFO crash retrievals talked about in the UFO community as a hypothetical? We've put together a significant trail of declassified documents — all public but many obscure — that suggest we're far closer to the truth of UFO crash operations than most think. From Battelle, a little known metallurgy contractor for the US Air Force, to Project Moon Dust, a space debris retrieval operation, there are many hints the US Government got its hands on exotic technology.

But what's missing from this picture? Canada. While the USG denies any UFO crashes ever took place on its soil, Canada has already disclosed several — but they're rarely, if ever talked about due to the somewhat convoluted way Canadian archives are organized. Thanks to the efforts of Jason Carignan, National Chief Investigator for MUFON Canada, we have three different UFO crash reports, including two where metal was recovered.

One Moon Dust file even shows the the USAF wanted access to crash debris in Canada, which isn't surprising, given both countries' deep relationship with UFO investigations and reporting procedures known as CIRVIS.
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11091 posts
Posted on 7/28/20 at 8:19 am to
NY Times authors interviewed:

https://outline.com/6yhF75

quote:

Do We Believe in U.F.O.s? That’s the Wrong Question
JULY 28, 2020
Times Insider explains who we are and what we do, and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together.


quote:

Numerous associates of the Pentagon program, with high security clearances and decades of involvement with official U.F.O. investigations, told us they were convinced such crashes have occurred, based on their access to classified information. But the retrieved materials themselves, and any data about them, are completely off-limits to anyone without clearances and a need to know.

The Pentagon’s U.F.O. Program has been using unclassified slides like this to brief government officials on threats from Advanced Aerospace Vehicles — “including off-world” — and materials retrieved from crashes of unidentified phenomena. We were provided a series of unclassified slides showing that the program took this seriously enough to include it in numerous briefings. One slide says one of the program’s tasks was to “arrange for access to data/reports/materials from crash retrievals of A.A.V.’s,” or advanced aerospace vehicles. Our sources told us that “A.A.V.” does not refer to vehicles made in any country — not Russian or Chinese — but is used to mean technology in the realm of the truly unexplained. They also assure us that their briefings are based on facts, not belief.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram