- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/13/17 at 5:18 pm to johnnydrama
quote:
Do you realize that due to Title IX if you pay 85 football players you also have to pay 85 female student-athletes the same ammount of money?
I do. That's the best argument against it.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 5:28 pm to johnnydrama
quote:
Do you realize that due to Title IX if you pay 85 football players you also have to pay 85 female student-athletes the same ammount of money?
Title IX's probably the most massive and obvious legal hurdle to overcome for these member institutions if they decide to do this, not to mention state and federal tax law will apply for the players' income and antitrust violations regarding wages as employees and federal immigration law concerning foreign athletes enrolling in schools, etc it's all a big clusterfrick that simply can't be solved unless laws are repealed or drastically altered at the legislative level. It's SO obvious why courts generally rule in favor of the NCAA and her member institutions in these cases, they're acutely aware of all the implications produced from such massive decisions and precedents. My solution: the NCAA needs to just chill out if a student-athlete receives an "impermissible benefit" or whatever and not impose draconian punishments, we all know it happens just chill it's really NBD.
Posted on 12/13/17 at 7:54 pm to johnnydrama
It’s all about Title IX. The pay that belongs to the revenue generating athletes instead goes to paying the tuition for a bunch of (mostly female) athletes that don’t produce any revenue. It’s not “fair” but it’s not designed to be fair.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News