- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
NY Prosecutors decide to give themselves huge bonus after civil asset forfeiture
Posted on 12/11/17 at 8:58 am
Posted on 12/11/17 at 8:58 am
Disgusting...
Who could have guessed that giving a public official unfettered access to millions with no oversight would cause problems? Even worse is that this money comes from people who were often never charged, arrested, indicted, or convicted.
Eta: forgot to add links
LINK
LINK
LINK
quote:
The Suffolk County District Attorney's Office in New York doled out $3.25 million in bonuses to prosecutors from its asset forfeiture fund since 2012, according to records obtained by Newsday through a Freedom of Information request.
Newsday reported that the funds were $500,000 more than previously reported, leading to consternation from local legislators:
Bonus recipients included deputy chief homicide prosecutor Robert Biancavilla, who received a total of $108,886 between 2012 and 2017, and division chief Edward Heilig and top public corruption prosecutor Christopher McPartland, who each received $73,000, according to records obtained from county Comptroller John Kennedy's office through the Freedom of Information Law [...]
On Tuesday, the legislature will hold a public hearing on a bill by Legis. Robert Calarco (D-Patchogue) to require asset forfeiture expenditures, including by the district attorney's office and the police, sheriff's and probation departments, to be approved by the Public Safety Committee [...]
"Asset forfeiture money that comes into this county counts into the millions of dollars," Calarco said. "That's a lot of money to be spent at the sole discretion of an individual with no oversight."
According to Newsday, the U.S. Attorney's Office has subpoenaed the Suffolk County D.A. for more records on the bonuses.
The probe is ongoing fallout from the investigation of former Suffolk County Police Chief James Burke. Burke was sentenced this year to 46 months in federal prison for the 2012 beating of a young man who had stolen a duffel bag full of pornography and sex toys from the chief's unlocked SUV and the coverup of the beating. Former Suffolk County District Attorney Thomas Spota and McPartland have been indicted for their alleged role in the coverup. Spota resigned a day after his indictment.
Duffel bags full of porno aside, the bonuses reveal one of the more problematic aspects of asset forfeiture. Law enforcement groups say asset forfeiture is a vital tool to disrupt organized drug trafficking. However, civil liberties advocates argue that lax reporting requirements, and the fact that asset forfeiture proceeds often flow directly into police and prosecutor budgets, create oversight-free expense accounts and perverse profit incentives.
Who could have guessed that giving a public official unfettered access to millions with no oversight would cause problems? Even worse is that this money comes from people who were often never charged, arrested, indicted, or convicted.
Eta: forgot to add links
LINK
LINK
LINK
This post was edited on 12/11/17 at 11:27 am
Posted on 12/11/17 at 9:01 am to NYNolaguy1
Incentivizing the taking of people's property without convictions. These prosecutors are no better than the criminals they attempt to prosecute.
Posted on 12/11/17 at 10:06 am to NYNolaguy1
Pretty terrible. Is there anyone of any political stripe who supports one or more of the following?:
1) Civil asset forfeiture (no criminal conviction or even criminal charges)
2) Proceeds of criminal or civil forfeiture going to the agencies and individuals responsible for the seizures/forfeitures
1) Civil asset forfeiture (no criminal conviction or even criminal charges)
2) Proceeds of criminal or civil forfeiture going to the agencies and individuals responsible for the seizures/forfeitures
Posted on 12/11/17 at 11:20 am to NYNolaguy1
You have a link to all this?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News