- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Could almost anyone born after 1940 fight in WWI
Posted on 12/5/17 at 8:01 pm to tiderider
Posted on 12/5/17 at 8:01 pm to tiderider
quote:
and this notion that today's youth are the problem is willfully ignorant at best ... most of ya'll and your precious parents haven't risked anything for your country and didn't when you had the chance
I’ve been drinking JD and probably misunderstood your post but those guys in the shithole of Iraq and Afghanistan risked quite a bit. It was nothing but one big arse booby trap.
Posted on 12/5/17 at 8:08 pm to windshieldman
quote:
quote:
and this notion that today's youth are the problem is willfully ignorant at best ... most of ya'll and your precious parents haven't risked anything for your country and didn't when you had the chance
I’ve been drinking JD and probably misunderstood your post but those guys in the shithole of Iraq and Afghanistan risked quite a bit. It was nothing but one big arse booby trap.
hence the use of the word "most" ...
Posted on 12/5/17 at 8:10 pm to windshieldman
quote:
I’ve been drinking JD and probably misunderstood your post but those guys in the shithole of Iraq and Afghanistan risked quite a bit. It was nothing but one big arse booby trap.
Even with civilian casualties, you can at least objectify that your enemy in the Middle East wants to destroy your way of life. You don't have that in WWI.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)