- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How did they justify the Steinle verdict?
Posted on 12/1/17 at 2:02 am to pwejr88
Posted on 12/1/17 at 2:02 am to pwejr88
you people do know the bullet bounced off the ground and traveled 80 ft and hit an artery, right. You do know that a ballistics/firearm expert testify that the best marksmen on the planet would not be able to duplicate the tragic shot even under lab conditions.
yes the guy was illegal, and should have been deported
no this was not murder
yes the guy was illegal, and should have been deported
no this was not murder
2
Posted on 12/1/17 at 3:20 am to pwejr88
They should have concentrated on some sort of manslaughter charge.
From what I know there are no elements of 'murder' which relate to the actions. Of course I am not a legal expert, but neither are the members of the jury.
Seems to me the only charge that could be sustained by evidence was recklessness.
He may well have intended to kill someone - but I am aware of no actual evidence to support that. I am sure this happens all the time.
The entity that should be attacked is the city and county of San Francisco.
It is their fecklessness that caused the death of Kate Steinle. They should be the ones to suffer the consequences. They need to be forced to enter one of those "Consent Decrees" which puts the FedGov in the position of directing their policing actions.
From what I know there are no elements of 'murder' which relate to the actions. Of course I am not a legal expert, but neither are the members of the jury.
Seems to me the only charge that could be sustained by evidence was recklessness.
He may well have intended to kill someone - but I am aware of no actual evidence to support that. I am sure this happens all the time.
The entity that should be attacked is the city and county of San Francisco.
It is their fecklessness that caused the death of Kate Steinle. They should be the ones to suffer the consequences. They need to be forced to enter one of those "Consent Decrees" which puts the FedGov in the position of directing their policing actions.
Posted on 12/1/17 at 10:45 am to pwejr88
I would bet 99.9% of the folks in this thread don't know the facts of the case.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News