- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is Net Nutrality about to be gone?
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:54 pm to Centinel
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:54 pm to Centinel
quote:If you're claiming it was done "as a courtesy" then obviously it wasn't stipulated in the original contract so they could have just let the connections bottleneck and still be perfectly within their terms. They didn't do it because there was no money to be made at the time. As soon as the contract was up they saw $$$$$. Throttled the frick out of Netflix at the expense of hundreds of thousands of people's experiences and forced more compensation for themselves. This is a picture perfect example of the experience we as customers are going to have under this structure.
Do you understand how a contract works?
This post was edited on 11/21/17 at 7:56 pm
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:56 pm to Drewbie
quote:
As soon as the contract was up they saw $$$$$.
No, they negotiated the new contract to reflect the increase need to provide this courtesy to NetFlix.
quote:
Throttled the frick out of Netflix at the expense of hundreds of thousands of people's expenses and forced more compensation for themselves.
That's how businesses operate. NetFlix is at fault here.
quote:
This is a picture perfect example of the experience we as customers are going to have under this structure.
So the ISP should have just kept providing this increased burden on their network without compensation?
Posted on 11/21/17 at 7:58 pm to Drewbie
quote:
If you're claiming it was done "as a courtesy" then obviously it wasn't stipulated in the original contract so they could have just let the connections bottleneck and still be perfectly within their terms. They didn't do it because there was no money to be made at the time. As soon as the contract was up they saw $$$$$. Throttled the frick out of Netflix at the expense of hundreds of thousands of people's experiences and forced more compensation for themselves. This is a picture perfect example of the experience we as customers are going to have under this structure.
Just stop... It's pointless to try to talk sense into the guy the said this earlier:
quote:
You missed my whole point though - we don't live in a world that needs speeds from 1996, we live in a world that needs speeds from 2017.
Those aren't needs. Those are wants.
quote:
We have Netflix, we have Youtube, we have Apple Music, etc. etc.
Wants, not needs.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)