- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The melt begins! Uranium One
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:46 pm to marklsu
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:46 pm to marklsu
All of that is irrelevant. We’ve allowed Russia, our mortal enemy mind you, to at the very least profit off of a strategic national resource.
quote:But some of it has been exported
The current licenses issued to Rosatom’s U.S. subsidiaries, issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, prohibit the company from exporting uranium outside the country, according to OilPrice.com. and Politico and Politifact and FactCheck
1
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:47 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
The Uranium, per say, is not sold to Russia. They don't take possession of it. They can't use it for nuclear means. They can just profit off of its use in the US and some has been sold back to Canada and yellowcake uranium has been sold only to US allies in Europe... but majority didn't leave US, and can't go to Russia.
And so your question is both unclear and misleading.....and possibly irrelevant.
And so your question is both unclear and misleading.....and possibly irrelevant.
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 7:50 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:48 pm to marklsu
If Russia is our enemy why would we allow them to profit off of our resources?
And I’m pretty sure some of it has left the US
And I’m pretty sure some of it has left the US
This post was edited on 11/14/17 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:48 pm to Strannix
quote:
But but it’s politically motivated!!! The marching orders are out, it’s beautiful!!!
Sessions stacked
Clinton’s fricked
Meanwhile there is a pedophile running for the senate in Alabama.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:49 pm to Cruiserhog
quote:
nah they good, this has been debunked so many times and while its unfortunate Trumpkins and Trump himself are too stupid to realize it, the DOJ will just confirm it all to the embarrassment of you dumbasses that believe this, including Trump.
If nothing else comes out of it except the Clintons having to spend tons of money to defend themselves, I'll still smile.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:50 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
And I’m pretty sure some of it has left the US
I corrected my statement.... It can't go to Russia.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:57 pm to marklsu
I’m just looking for a bit of consistency. I honestly don’t care if some Russian company is making a few bucks off of a candian mining operation in the United States. Hell, more jobs for Americans I guess. The point is that neither Clinton, the media or anyone on the left considered Russia our enemy until Trump won the election. In fact, Clinton and the media did everything in their power to convince us that Russia wasn’t an enemy during her tenure as SecState. None of this is about Russia. It’s about Trump and nothing else.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:58 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
If Russia is our enemy why would we allow them to profit off of our resources?
And I’m pretty sure some of it has left the US
China profits off of lots of our natural resources.... many would call China an enemy.
All kinds of nations profit off our natural resources....
Whether they should or shouldn't really is not what is being thrown at Clinton/Obama...
They are hurling accusations that the sale was a quid pro quo. There is no evidence of that. Sessions confirmed that today. He was hammered hard by Republicans, and he hammered back saying there is no factual basis to bring a special prosecutor, and why? Because this entire sale had to be approved by every single facet of our government, including the CIA and FBI and DOJ.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 7:59 pm to marklsu
quote:I could say the same about those hurling accusations of quid pro quo between Trump and Putin.
They are hurling accusations that the sale was a quid pro quo. There is no evidence of that.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:00 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I’m just looking for a bit of consistency. I honestly don’t care if some Russian company is making a few bucks off of a candian mining operation in the United States. Hell, more jobs for Americans I guess. The point is that neither Clinton, the media or anyone on the left considered Russia our enemy until Trump won the election. In fact, Clinton and the media did everything in their power to convince us that Russia wasn’t an enemy during her tenure as SecState. None of this is about Russia. It’s about Trump and nothing else.
I agree with some of what you're saying. I apologize for some of my strong words.
I have considered Russia an enemy for a long time, longer than 2016 election.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:01 pm to marklsu
Keep repeating that and just maybe it’ll come true.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:03 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
I could say the same about those hurling accusations of quid pro quo between Trump and Putin.
This is where I differ from you.
As Sessions said today, you have to have factual basis with enough evidence to form a special prosecutor..... they are seldom used. Charges have been filed by FBI (a Republican-majority institution --which it shouldn't be) already, and there are roughly 14 different areas Mueller is investigating.... Along with the fact that 17 different intelligence agencies agree that Russia meddled and now, we have Donald Trump Jr admitting that he sought out help from Russia in the campaign... The standard for special prosecutor for Russia/Trump was easily met.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:05 pm to DEG
quote:
Why are trumpcucks still melting over the Clinton's? Is she honestly a threat for the white house in 2020?
She wasn’t a threat in 2016
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:08 pm to marklsu
quote:Okay, where is the evidence that there was some sort of quid pro quo?
As Sessions said today, you have to have factual basis with enough evidence to form a special prosecutor..... they are seldom used. Charges have been filed by FBI (a Republican-majority institution --which it shouldn't be) already, and there are roughly 14 different areas Mueller is investigating.... Along with the fact that 17 different intelligence agencies agree that Russia meddled and now, we have Donald Trump Jr admitting that he sought out help from Russia in the campaign... The standard for special prosecutor for Russia/Trump was easily met.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:15 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
That's apparently what the FBI has, but hasn't revealed as the investigation is ongoing.
quote:
Okay, where is the evidence that there was some sort of quid pro quo?
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:16 pm to marklsu
quote:Link?
That's apparently what the FBI has
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:18 pm to marklsu
quote:
Okay, where is the evidence that there was some sort of quid pro quo?
Flynn is likely the person that committed a crime that pulled the FBI in. FBI/CIA also found enough material in 2016, during campaign, to open an investigation, conducted under Comey, to investigate the Trump Campaign--but as Trump likes to point out, not Trump himself.
All the other peeps in trouble... like Manafort are examples of where this investigation is leading.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:24 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
now, we have Donald Trump Jr admitting that he sought out help from Russia in the campaign.
Not a crime
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:25 pm to marklsu
Lmao, Obama used the fake dossier so they could use FISA and the intelligence services to spy on the Trump campaign for Hilary.
Posted on 11/14/17 at 8:27 pm to marklsu
quote:
I have considered Russia an enemy for a long time, longer than 2016 election.
the 1980’s called, they want there foreign policy back Melt
Page 4 of 5
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News