Actually on the much longer piped in music thread a while back the overwhelming response was negative.

You also totally fail to address what has changed from 2007 or much less a couple of weeks ago with the Auburn game.

Why? Because you can't.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TigerFan4040

Member since Sep 2013

4386 posts

Posted on 11/14/17 at 9:45 am to TigerGman

quote:
what has changed from 2007

-Way more on-the-field introductions is killing momentum on breaks
-Video montages are too long and boring as compared to the quick and punchy videos from years past (4th Q comebacks, "here comes the boom" big hits, Hawthorne calls on big plays).
-Way shittier piped in music (some of the songs they play now were actually popular in 2007 - or at the least more relevant in 2007).
-The actual PRODUCTION of the game from a media standpoint: when they choose/not choose to pipe in music/videos, what music/videos they choose to play, why they choose to play it is what has taken an absolute downturn in recent years.
- I love the band - LOVE THE BAND - But when and how long they play could be better (or more timely). The oweo song after scores is too long and not as impactful as it could be for getting the crowd going and sustaining momentum. Again, love the band - they are a HUGE part of the gameday experience and always should be.

And I have the same issues with the gameday production during the AU game as any other game - difference being what was happening on the field yielded way more crowd noise and intensity organically. Not every game is going to be a blockbuster thriller beating ranked teams with the crown going wild. When thats not happening, the production of the game (from a media/band standpoint) can and does have an affect on the team and crowds intesnsity.