Started By
Message

re: Corporate income tax is borne primarily by labor and workers, research shows.

Posted on 11/8/17 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

The point of this thread, which I derailed by going too abstract, is to discuss the incidence of the corporate income tax.

Can we go a step further and acknowledge that the point of discussing incidence of the corporate tax is to defend the position that cutting it would actually be a tax cut for workers?

That is the point, yes?
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69494 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Can we go a step further and acknowledge that the point of discussing incidence of the corporate tax is to defend the position that cutting it would actually be a tax cut for workers?


Sure, and this is where I get lost in the literature, to be honest. Let's say there are 2 periods, one before the corp tax, one after. I understand why a company can pass on their tax bill to workers in the form of lower wages. What I can't understand in my mind, intuitively, is why cutting the corp tax rate would incentivize them to raise the wages back to what they were before the corp tax was levied.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram