Started By
Message

re: I'm being offered Mike Evans for Greg Zuerlien lol, should I?

Posted on 11/8/17 at 9:43 am to
Posted by Tigereye10005
New York, NY
Member since Sep 2016
1592 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 9:43 am to
I don't know why I'm continuing to respond to this insanity lol, but I just want to point out that, according to your statement that Evans would be replacing either a WR2 (11-20) or Flex WR (20-25), you're assuming that the team also has a WR1 (1-10)

In this scenario, the team would already have 3 TOP 25 WRs, including at least 1 that's inside the TOP 10.

So if a team already has that then that team is stacked as is.

and even if that were the case, I still do this trade every time.

I could own the #1QB; #1 and #2 RB, and the #1 #2 and #3 WR and I would still make this trade every time lol.
Posted by Peazey
Metry
Member since Apr 2012
25418 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 9:52 am to
He's comparing Mike Evans to an unreasonable assumption for the replacement value in order to tank his relative value.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
30606 posts
Posted on 11/8/17 at 10:23 am to
quote:

could own the #1QB; #1 and #2 RB, and the #1 #2 and #3 WR and I would still make this trade every time lol.

And you would lose out on 4 points every game. Yea your bench would be stacked, but that only matters is your 4th WR was garbage and you have an injury or a bye week
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram