quote:
Alabama or Georgia is in.

What if one loses in the SEC Championship by a last second field goal? Is the committee really going to punish the loser by keeping them out?

I think so.

What is the point of having the SECCG if the result doesn't matter? Just like Wisconsin shouldn't get in even if they play the winner of the B1G East close

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by magildachunks

Member since Oct 2006

32542 posts

Posted on 10/29/17 at 10:46 am to Buckeye06

quote:
What is the point of having the SECCG if the result doesn't matter? Just like Wisconsin shouldn't get in even if they play the winner of the B1G East close

Right?

You can't say ND will be punished for not playing in one, but then say a team shouldn't be punished for losing one.

Win your conference, then get in.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by 12Pence

Member since Jan 2013

6344 posts

Posted on 10/29/17 at 10:53 am to Buckeye06

quote:

What is the point of having the SECCG if the result doesn't matter? Just like Wisconsin shouldn't get in even if they play the winner of the B1G East close

You have to consider the entire body of work, right? Why should one be punished because they lost the last game as opposed to earlier in the season?

Look at Georgia and Oklahoma for example. Both will have an impressive win: @ Ohio State and @ Notre Dame. Oklahoma lost to Iowa State and let's say that Georgia loses 24-21 to Alabama on a game winning 50 yard field goal. Why should Georgia be bounced out in favor of another team?

The whole point of the Playoff committee is to get the best 4 teams in, right?

0 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board