- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dual Threat QB at LSU with Canada's system
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:36 pm to prepsportsallday
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:36 pm to prepsportsallday
His QB rating was around 130 roughly 30 points lower than Petersons and 10 points lower than Etlings. Etling is more efficient and Petersons numbers blow him out of the water. Again compare his numbers to Canada's traditional QBs and you'll see his offense is more effective with the latter under center.
This post was edited on 10/17/17 at 5:41 pm
1
Posted on 10/17/17 at 5:40 pm to Madking
quote:
His QB rating was around 130 and his yardage and TDs were low for his volume of throws. Etling is more efficient and Petersons numbers blow him out of the water. Again compare his numbers to Canada's traditional QBs and you'll see his offense is more effective with the latter under center.
So we agree. There was nothing "Terrible" about Brissettes numbers. When you factor in his ability on the ground, it creates opportunities.
I do believe that Pitt was a better team overall last year compared the 2014 and 15 NCstate team. Much of what Peterman did is skewed by the high number of shovel passes thrown last year. It drives up the percentage, when in fact he didnt throw down field very much.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News