- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Orgeron cared more about his buyout than his salary. - Mike Detillier
Posted on 10/5/17 at 6:41 pm to adamb2151
Posted on 10/5/17 at 6:41 pm to adamb2151
I'm as anti-Zero as it gets, but I understand why he would approach the negotiations the way he did. OM promised to give him the full four years to implement his program, then fired him after three. He watched Nutt go 9-4 with his recruits, and he most likely believes he would have had the same record. It's delusional, but he believes it.
Other reason he was so worried about the buyout is he just saw us fire Miles. So the bar is very, very high.
Other reason he was so worried about the buyout is he just saw us fire Miles. So the bar is very, very high.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 6:43 pm to Bestbank Tiger
He had zero leverage. Zero.
You hand him a contract and say take it or get fricked, you binder-totin' unqualified failure.
You hand him a contract and say take it or get fricked, you binder-totin' unqualified failure.
Posted on 10/5/17 at 6:44 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
I'm as anti-Zero as it gets, but I understand why he would approach the negotiations the way he did. OM promised to give him the full four years to implement his program, then fired him after three. He watched Nutt go 9-4 with his recruits, and he most likely believes he would have had the same record. It's delusional, but he believes it. Other reason he was so worried about the buyout is he just saw us fire Miles. So the bar is very, very high.
And with all that being said, he still had zero leverage.
Sure, maybe he could've gotten another D-line position somewhere. But we still have Pete Jenkins now, so it's not like he'd have been any great loss.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)