Started By
Message

re: 1 Game wild card is awful, but at least the right team won

Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:58 am to
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
32247 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 8:58 am to
quote:

Gimmick bullshite for ratings like I said.




It was made to give a disadvantage to the WC team and a reward for winning the division. Having to start your ace in the WC game and then likely only getting to throw them one time in the 5 game alds is a huge disadvantage. The game 7 feel and more meaning regular season were just extra bonuses.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36836 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Gimmick bullshite for ratings like I said.


god forbid they try to entertain us
Posted by Weagle25
THE Football State.
Member since Oct 2011
46274 posts
Posted on 10/4/17 at 9:50 am to
quote:

It was made to give a disadvantage to the WC team and a reward for winning the division.

First of all, no that's not why it was made. It was made because there were actual ties at the end of the season so they had one game tiebreakers to see who made the playoffs. People liked the drama so they came up with a way to do it every year even when there wasn't a tie.

Second, you shouldn't be punished for being the wildcard team. The wild card often has a better record than at least one of the division winners so why should they be punished? Winning your division doesn't really mean shite besides saying you're the best team in that division. The division winner already gets home field. That's enough advantage.

If you feel like you need to put a disadvantage in for the wildcard team, then you probably shouldn't even have the wildcard team in the playoffs to begin with.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram