- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Removing state and local tax deduction: A left jab at liberals?
Posted on 9/28/17 at 8:41 am to KeyserSoze999
Posted on 9/28/17 at 8:41 am to KeyserSoze999
I have always been a fan of 'ZERO DEDUCTIONS" = but combined with sane tax rate structures and a requirement to REDUCE SPENDING as the FIRST RESPONSE to budgetary problems.
Only existential emergencies should even be considered for unfunded expenditures.
NO SOCIETAL EXPERIMENTATION in any tax policy.
Leave all charity to private individuals/organizations that receive no tax incentive to "do what their hearts tell them to do."
If a person doesn't want to work, he needs to find someone who sympathizes with his plight to help him survive. If he cannot find someone who will take from their own pocket to assist him, then I don't care if he starves himself to death.
I exempt from all my statements, now and forevermore, true emergency situations on a temporary basis as a public health issue.
I do not exempt generational dysfunction from this draconian concept. If a culture wants to become 'on the edge' or lazy or disrespectful or violent, or unproductive, they need to find themselves a sponsor who can provide their sustenance out of personal sympathy with their plight or agreement with their objectives. If they cannot sustain themselves, or find someone to support them in their culture, then that culture should be allowed to die out from natural selection. Let the laws of nature determine the way cultures 'progress.'
Only existential emergencies should even be considered for unfunded expenditures.
NO SOCIETAL EXPERIMENTATION in any tax policy.
Leave all charity to private individuals/organizations that receive no tax incentive to "do what their hearts tell them to do."
If a person doesn't want to work, he needs to find someone who sympathizes with his plight to help him survive. If he cannot find someone who will take from their own pocket to assist him, then I don't care if he starves himself to death.
I exempt from all my statements, now and forevermore, true emergency situations on a temporary basis as a public health issue.
I do not exempt generational dysfunction from this draconian concept. If a culture wants to become 'on the edge' or lazy or disrespectful or violent, or unproductive, they need to find themselves a sponsor who can provide their sustenance out of personal sympathy with their plight or agreement with their objectives. If they cannot sustain themselves, or find someone to support them in their culture, then that culture should be allowed to die out from natural selection. Let the laws of nature determine the way cultures 'progress.'
Posted on 9/28/17 at 8:46 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
he needs to find someone who sympathizes with his plight to help him survive. If he cannot find someone who will take from their own pocket to assist him, then I don't care if he starves himself to death.
starvation can be quite the motivator, charity needs to be volunteered, not enforced by the government
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)