Started By
Message

re: Question to libs about prexisting conditions and high risk

Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:44 pm to
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
21051 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

That's not what you are paying for. I don't even think you believe that. CAn you rephrase that? Not trying to be a dick.


In part, yes. And in part, protection from health costs for not so serious illnesses that I may or may not get.

quote:

The methodology is the same.


It shouldn't be because they are very different industries.

quote:

OK. If you insure shipping containers and your insured is sending containers through an area known to be full of pirates should they be able to charge more? When you first began providing them insurance they didn't serve pirate infested waters?


In your scenario, you are asking if premiums should increase based on the insured choosing a more dangerous business practice. It doesn't make sense to compare this to something like somebody getting cancer, which is not a choice.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141313 posts
Posted on 9/21/17 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

In part, yes. And in part, protection from health costs for not so serious illnesses that I may or may not get.


There is nothing in your health insurance contract that indicates that you are paying for good health. It's just not there. I really don't understand where you are going with this.

If you think the methodology should be different then please explain how price setting between one risk and another should be performed differently. I'm sure you could make a ton speaking to actuaries.

What if your cancer is lung cancer due to smoking?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram