- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FSBDL 2018 - MWG is your Champion
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:23 pm to reddman
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:23 pm to reddman
I am going to propose that we add this to the constitution:
During the offseason, when a trade results in a team having an illegal roster, the owner of said team must make the roster legal within 24 hours of deal being accepted. No trading will be allowed by that team until then. Failure to make the roster legal will result in a 1 week in-season suspension of add/drop privileges for each 24 hour period that passes with an illegal roster.
(we can actually use fantrax to lock someone out of transactions for a given period).
If you would vote for this rule, please upvote. If not, please downvote and give reasons why. If this gets enough support on here tonight, I will put it up for an official vote later tonight or tomorrow morning. Since it is a new rule, it would need a majority of those that actually vote in order to pass.
During the offseason, when a trade results in a team having an illegal roster, the owner of said team must make the roster legal within 24 hours of deal being accepted. No trading will be allowed by that team until then. Failure to make the roster legal will result in a 1 week in-season suspension of add/drop privileges for each 24 hour period that passes with an illegal roster.
(we can actually use fantrax to lock someone out of transactions for a given period).
If you would vote for this rule, please upvote. If not, please downvote and give reasons why. If this gets enough support on here tonight, I will put it up for an official vote later tonight or tomorrow morning. Since it is a new rule, it would need a majority of those that actually vote in order to pass.
This post was edited on 2/22/18 at 6:25 pm
Posted on 2/22/18 at 6:26 pm to reddman
What if a player had two moves to make simultaneously?
Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another....
Say I brokered a 2 for 1 with one team and a 1 for 2 with another....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News