Started By
Message

re: The discussion of civil war is irresponsible and ignorant.

Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:00 am to
Posted by ehidal1
Chief Boot Knocka
Member since Dec 2007
37141 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:00 am to
What we are seeing is a result of the Fedgov growing its power. The founding fathers believed in power to the states, in which you are somewhat correct. If the locality majority wants something, it was to go to its local leadership and push for change. More power to the states would allow for the removal of a statue (for example) at a local level.

What we've allowed with the FedGov power and a complicit media, is a small vocal minority to dictate rule across the country. It isn't localized. It's a movement that has effectively silenced the majority and pushing fear for change at the national level.

If states still had any power, this national divide movement would have trouble gaining steam in red states.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80401 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 8:10 am to
Name me one federal official who has ordered the removal of a statue.

It's all been governors and mayors. Federalism is working.
This post was edited on 8/19/17 at 9:03 am
Posted by WhiskeyPapa
Member since Aug 2016
9277 posts
Posted on 8/19/17 at 9:03 am to
quote:

The founding fathers believed in power to the states, in which you are somewhat correct.


That isn't right. The Union of the states was paramount.

Probably the most important aspect of our federal system is dual sovereignty.

"Dual federalism, also known as layer-cake federalism or divided sovereignty, is a political arrangement in which power is divided between the federal and state governments in clearly defined terms, with state governments exercising those powers accorded to them without interference from the federal government." - wiki

That said, the founding fathers wanted a central government. They differed on how powerful. Hamilton wanted a very powerful central government. Jefferson, not so much.

"It is hoped that by a due poise and partition of powers between the General and particular governments, we have found the secret of extending the benign blessings of republicanism over still greater tracts of country than we possess, and that a subdivision may be avoided for ages, if not forever."

--Thomas Jefferson to James Sullivan, 1791

"Our citizens have wisely formed themselves into one nation as to others and several States as among themselves. To the united nation belong our external and mutual relations; to each State, severally, the care of our persons, our property, our reputation and religious freedom."

--Thomas Jefferson: To Rhode Island Assembly, 1801.

"The preservation of the general government in its whole constitutional vigor, as the sheet anchor of our peace at home and safety abroad, I deem [one of] the essential principles of our government, and consequently [one of] those which ought to shape its administration."

--Thomas Jefferson: 1st Inaugural Address, 1801.

"It is of immense consequence that the States retain as complete authority as possible over their own citizens. The withdrawing themselves under the shelter of a foreign jurisdiction is so subversive of order and so pregnant of abuse, that it may not be amiss to consider how far a law of praemunire [a punishable offense against government] should be revised and modified, against all citizens who attempt to carry their causes before any other than the State courts, in cases where those other courts have no right to their cognizance."

--Thomas Jefferson to James Monroe, 1797. ME 9:424

It is a fatal heresy to suppose that either our State governments are superior to the Federal or the Federal to the States. The people, to whom all authority belongs, have divided the powers of government into two distinct departments, the leading characters of which are foreign and domestic; and they have appointed for each a distinct set of functionaries. These they have made coordinate, checking and balancing each other like the three cardinal departments in the individual States; each equally supreme as to the powers delegated to itself, and neither authorized ultimately to decide what belongs to itself or to its coparcener in government. As independent, in fact, as different nations."

--Thomas Jefferson to Spencer Roane, 1821. ME 15:328

"The spirit of concord [amongst] sister States... alone carried us successfully through the revolutionary war, and finally placed us under that national government, which constitutes the safety of every part, by uniting for its protection the powers of the whole."

--Thomas Jefferson to William Eustis, 1809. ME 12:227

George Washington was pretty definitive:

From George Washington to John Jay, 15 August 1786

To John Jay

Mount Vernon 15th Augt 1786

Dear Sir

I have to thank you very sincerely for your interesting letter of the 27th of June, as well as for the other communications you had the goodness to make at the same time.
I am sorry to be assured, of what indeed I had little doubt before, that we have been guilty of violating the treaty in some instances. What a misfortune it is the British should have so well grounded a pretext for their palpable infractions?—and what a disgraceful part, out of the choice of difficulties before us, are we to act?... I do not conceive we can exist long as a nation, without having lodged somewhere a power which will pervade the whole Union in as energetic a manner, as the authority of the different state governments extends over the several States. To be fearful of vesting Congress, constituted as that body is, with ample authorities for national purposes, appears to me the very climax of popular absurdity and madness."




God save our American states
This post was edited on 8/19/17 at 9:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram