- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is anyone else laughing about this "red line" media creation?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:40 am to SlowFlowPro
Is this
that much different than
Seriously?
quote:
North Korea will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen if it threatened the United States again.
that much different than
quote:
- North Korea will cross a red line if it threatens the United States again.
Seriously?
Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:43 am to a want
Can you rank whom is responsible for the norks having nukes and our current nork situation?
Blowjob bill. The Bush bros. Odumbo the clown. And the orange menace.
Let's see if you can be honest with yourself and with us.
Blowjob bill. The Bush bros. Odumbo the clown. And the orange menace.
Let's see if you can be honest with yourself and with us.
Posted on 8/9/17 at 11:46 am to a want
yes
especially since Trump hasn't even been given a chance to make the comparison they're trying to make (Obama's red line fiasco in Syria is OK because Trump did the same thing with NK).
the primary question is, if they're not trying to compare Trump to Obama, why even use the term associated with Obama?
then, the follow up: since they're trying to hard to compare Trump to Obama in dissimilar situations, what is the purpose?
especially since Trump hasn't even been given a chance to make the comparison they're trying to make (Obama's red line fiasco in Syria is OK because Trump did the same thing with NK).
the primary question is, if they're not trying to compare Trump to Obama, why even use the term associated with Obama?
then, the follow up: since they're trying to hard to compare Trump to Obama in dissimilar situations, what is the purpose?
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)