quote:
So now you're changing from your initial definition of reasonable (after facts show it to be stupid) to whatever deranged belief you have. Sweet. Glad we cleared that up.

I didn't say that at all. I'm saying that there are a few nations known for their ability to hack. The US doesn't seem likely, since that means they were targeting the side in opposition to the person who they didn't want to win.

And considering Russia is one of the most obvious suspects of any hacking of this type, and you all said they had good reason to want Hillary and her WWIII vendetta to lose, then I think Russia is one of the most reasonable suspects.

Then again, that it's also reasonable to conclude Russia didn't hack, but that doesn't negate the reasonableness of the alternative.

Neither you nor I can say either way. So what is so wrong with saying Russia is a reasonable suspect, given their history and their capability?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by CptBengal

BR Baby

Member since Dec 2007

71661 posts

Posted on 8/3/17 at 11:51 pm to buckeye_vol

quote:
Why did they despise Hillary?

I don't know.

You gave that as a reason.

so you are literally now making up phantom motives to support a contention that has no proof.

...then you call it "reasonable"

quote:
And considering Russia is one of the most obvious suspects of any hacking of this type, a

why? because you say so?

China, NK, fricking random hackers online, all of them are behind Russia? WHy?

quote:
Neither you nor I can say either way. So what is so wrong with saying Russia is a reasonable suspect,

again you clown...if you can make the claim that nobody knows, then all actors with that ability are "reasonable"...here'a nice map of LIVE of hacking for you to ponder, clown:

LINK

fricking imbecile.

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board